According to a message received today, there is an investigation into Mr. Ryan’s previous cases with the State Campaign Spending Commission.
SUPPORTING PROOF ON CARROLL ISSUE
In 2009, Ryan submitted as evidence against the John Carroll Campaign, a forged contract between Mr. Ryan and Mr. Carroll. Mr. Ryan said this document “was proof that Mr. Carroll owed him money”- $6,000 a month.
Mr. Carroll was able to prove that this document was a forgery in the Campaign Spending Commission proceedings but a criminal case was never pursued. Forging an official legal document is a felony.
Forged contract Ryan created
Eric Ryan Forged Carroll Contract
Copy of the check John Carroll gave to Eric Ryan to help him as a loan to pay his equity for his home:
John Carrol Loans Eric $6000 Check
Mr. Ryan stated that this check was for payment of his services per the (forged) contract. The check’s memo clearly states that it was for “EQUITY” not to pay Mr. Ryan’s salary.
Mr. Ryan cashed the check accepting what is was for, “equity.” Cashing a check means that the casher agrees to the terms of the check. The Campaign Spending Commission did not believe Mr. Ryan’s claim that Mr. Carroll owed him money.
This is a sample of what a real John Carroll contract looks like HERE
PINE
Mr. Ryan is trying to claim that a check Representative Kymberly Pine wrote to him was also for another purpose other than what was written on the check. He also claims that she too, owes him money.
The campaign spending commission reminded him in 2009 of the law that he should not be cashing checks that are not for its intended written purpose. Yet he is claiming to be a victim under the same circumstances.
THE INVOICES
Also not criminally filed are the fake invoices Mr. Ryan sent to his former clients after he was fired. According to witnesses in the campaigns of Stop Rail Now, John Carroll, Kymberly Pine and most recently Tom Berg, Mr. Ryan sent invoices months after the fact claiming that his clients owed him money for work he did.
An invoice is considered a legal document of “agreed terms between the seller and the purchaser.” None of his victims ever agreed to his invoice terms and were all given “past due” invoices.
Mr. Ryan could be prosecuted for each forged document and spend up to one year in jail per forged document.
More samples of Mr. Ryan’s forgery will be coming soon!
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Monday, August 1, 2011
Carroll Cox and Eric Ryan
The following message was put up by Cox on his website that was directed at this site. Please read: http://carrollcox.com/EricRyanComments.htm
RESPONSE TO IT
This site was NOT created by Rollman. There is no sole "owner". It is just a site created for people to use as a forum, compile and publish information and allow people to submit theirs. There were quite a few people who had things to say or information to submit about Ryan, They were either scared to or unsure where to go.
The site seems one sided because no one has submitted anything in Ryan's defense. NOT ONE PERSON. It would be published if it was sent. Unlike Ryan's site, this site has a comments section and a form to fill out to submit your thoughts and comments.
Keep in mind many believe Eric to be a hacker and cyber criminal. This is the main reason why no one wants their name out there. Eric is already capable of attacks at people he doesn't like or agree with. He moves on from one person to the next and no one wants to become his next target. They just want to see him be brought to justice.
No one was calling for your job. Your information was published for those who don't agree with the way you are running your show.
Fact: You DID NOT read one question that we posted here which was also emailed to you.
One of those "callers" was a recording. You thanked the caller as if it was someone calling in but it was just a recording. You did not take all callers, you admitted yourself you were pre-screening. You did not have one caller aside from Berg, that was speaking for the "other side".
Your comment below is interesting. This was actually one of the questions posted here for Mr. Ryan. Too bad you didn't ask him this?
"We encourage you to take any "evidence" you claim to have documenting Mr. Ryan's "illegal activities", to the appropriate law enforcement agencies and try them in the court of law, not the court of public opinion. " Carroll Cox
A case is building against him and those facts will be posted when we have been cleared to do so. Both lawyers and law officials advised against communicating with him.
Fact: "circling the wagons" is getting old.
You seem mighty offended that information was posted about you and that people don't agree with your choices. Don't we have the right to speak out too? Imagine Ryan put up a site like that about you. Do you really defend him for that or do you think his information should have been sent to the "appropriate law enforcement agencies and try them in the court of law, not the court of public opinion." ?
RESPONSE TO IT
This site was NOT created by Rollman. There is no sole "owner". It is just a site created for people to use as a forum, compile and publish information and allow people to submit theirs. There were quite a few people who had things to say or information to submit about Ryan, They were either scared to or unsure where to go.
The site seems one sided because no one has submitted anything in Ryan's defense. NOT ONE PERSON. It would be published if it was sent. Unlike Ryan's site, this site has a comments section and a form to fill out to submit your thoughts and comments.
Keep in mind many believe Eric to be a hacker and cyber criminal. This is the main reason why no one wants their name out there. Eric is already capable of attacks at people he doesn't like or agree with. He moves on from one person to the next and no one wants to become his next target. They just want to see him be brought to justice.
No one was calling for your job. Your information was published for those who don't agree with the way you are running your show.
Fact: You DID NOT read one question that we posted here which was also emailed to you.
One of those "callers" was a recording. You thanked the caller as if it was someone calling in but it was just a recording. You did not take all callers, you admitted yourself you were pre-screening. You did not have one caller aside from Berg, that was speaking for the "other side".
Your comment below is interesting. This was actually one of the questions posted here for Mr. Ryan. Too bad you didn't ask him this?
"We encourage you to take any "evidence" you claim to have documenting Mr. Ryan's "illegal activities", to the appropriate law enforcement agencies and try them in the court of law, not the court of public opinion. " Carroll Cox
A case is building against him and those facts will be posted when we have been cleared to do so. Both lawyers and law officials advised against communicating with him.
Fact: "circling the wagons" is getting old.
You seem mighty offended that information was posted about you and that people don't agree with your choices. Don't we have the right to speak out too? Imagine Ryan put up a site like that about you. Do you really defend him for that or do you think his information should have been sent to the "appropriate law enforcement agencies and try them in the court of law, not the court of public opinion." ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)